What is interesting about this story is that Tarullo teaches within the same Law faculty (Georgetown) as Adam Levitin, who has spent the last month detailing the nightmare putback scenario for Bank of America and others.
Levitin's thoughts can be found in these 2 stories:
---
John Carney has the details...
If you were counting on the big U.S. banks to restore or increase dividends that were pared back or ended during the financial crisis, you might want to think again.
The final portions of a prepared speech by a top Federal Reserve official seemed aimed at pulling-back market expectations that the central bank would soon authorize a resumption of dividends.
The Fed has been preparing guidelines on how banks will be able to change their dividend policies in the first quarter of next year. When that news was reported last week—the Wall Street Journal’s headline was “Fed to Let Banks Increase Dividend” — the stocks of several banks rose.
But Fed governor Daniel Tarullo appeared to be trying to tamper the exuberance over the new Fed guidelines.
- “Although the details of these guidelines are still being finalized, I can say that our approach to considering such requests will be a conservative one.”
- “We will expect firms to submit convincing capital plans that demonstrate their ability to absorb losses over the next two years under an adverse economic scenario that we will specify, and still remain amply capitalized,” Tarullo said. “We also expect that firms will have a sound estimate of any significant risks that may not be captured by the stress testing, such as potential mortgage put-back exposures, and the capacity to absorb any consequent losses.”
---