Pitchfork responds to Denninger.
---
First off, a big hat tip to Karl Denninger for bringing this issue out in the open. In a number of recent television appearances, as well as on his blog, the Market Ticker, Denninger has argued in no uncertain terms that the Tea Party movement has been hijacked by the GOP establishment. He has called some of the would-be leaders of the movement, like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich, "a joke," and has referred to some of their Tea-Party followers as "douchebag groups." (Ouch.) On one level, he's exactly right -- many of the would-be leaders of the movement are a joke. Palin and Gingrich, for example, provide no credible or substantive alternative to the GOP establishment that spent 8 years ruining the country -- the same GOP establishment that stabbed conservative voters in the back after the '94 Republican "Revolution." (Some of us still have the scars to prove it.)
As far as that goes, Denninger is right on the money, but he makes a big mistake in writing off the Tea Party altogether. Here's why. First, as a number of Ticker Forum regulars have pointed out, there is no such thing as one, unitary "Tea Party." Local, grass-roots Tea Party groups are still concerned about the bailouts, the spending and the increasing size and scope of government. They may not all know what a collateralized debt obligation is, or a credit default swap, but they do not like the bailouts and they are opposed to almost any kind of special favor being granted by the government to one group of citizens, while another group of citizens gets the bill. Bailouts or handouts -- they're foresquare against them. That's all to the good. And besides, many Tea Party folks are just as concerned as Denninger about the GOP taking over their movement. He seems to "misunderstimate" the intelligence of individual Tea Partiers.
The problem, though, as Denninger points out, is that the Tea Party movement, as such, has been almost totally silent about the ongoing fraud and predation being perpetrated by parts of the financial system. Moreover, the movement has been mostly silent about the government's role in subsidizing and condoning the looting. Because of this, Denninger feels compelled to tell the Tea Party to "Go Screw" and writes them off entirely until further notice. He's right about the facts of the situation, but he's wrong in placing so much of the blame on ordinary Tea Partiers, and he's wrong in writing off the movement.
In addition to there being many different local Tea Party groups, as well as Tea Party umbrella groups, each with its own particular concerns and issues, there is also a big distinction that must be made between the leadership (so called, such as it is) and the movement's rank and file. People like Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck wield an inordinately disproportionate amount of power over which Tea-Party issues come to the fore and which issues get coverage in the mainstream media. Sarah Palin can post a brief comment on Facebook or Twitter about "death panels" or Van Jones, and it's a raging national issue for the next six months. To some degree, the media's focus on people like Palin distorts the perception of the actual Tea Party movement, but it also inevitably shapes the movement itself by helping to determine which issues capture the attention of rank and file members.
With good reason, Denninger asks why we haven't seen the Tea Party (on any large scale) protesting the massive fraud in the financial system. Similarly, Cenk Uygur asked the other day how come the Tea Partiers haven't camped out in front of the Fed or protested at the US Treasury. Indeed, why isn't Tim Geithner as well known and reviled as Nancy Pelosi? The movement has been strong in protesting against "socialism" and Obamacare, but the banks (and their errand boys at the Fed and Treasury) have gotten off easy.
It's impossible to know for certain whether or not this is by design. Maybe there are good reasons why certain issues, like health care, have taken the limelight away from the white-collar criminals who every year extract billions and billions of dollars from the economy at the expense of ordinary Americans. Again, I don't know whether that gets overlooked because of the undue influence of the establishment GOP and the media, or if there are other, more subtle reasons. But I do know this: people like Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck have NOT highlighted financial fraud, the ongoing bailouts and backdoor bailouts, government subsidies (legal and financial) for the largest corporations, or the overall corruption and lack of accountability in our system at almost every level. They could be highlighting these issues, but they don't. And they haven't. THAT is the problem, not the Tea Party itself.
Looking at this from a slightly different angle, IF -- by some miracle -- Sarah Palin were to tweet something about Lloyd Blankfein's bonus or credit default swaps at AIG, it would be a national political issue almost instantaneously. If Glenn Beck ranted and raved (or cried) about the "banksters" and how they've screwed us all, "you betcha" the banksters would be issue # 1 at the next 9-12 rally. We could forget the damn birth certificate for a while and audit the Fed. Stephen Friedman could be the next Van Jones. AIG FP could be shut down faster than Acorn.
But Palin, Beck, and Gingrich won't willingly do any of that, and Denninger is right to call them out on it, but that's precisely why we can't write off the Tea Party movement -- not yet. If these clowns can get the Tea Party activists worked up about Acorn or Van Jones(?), then there is massive potential still there, waiting to be tapped. And again, many Tea Partiers are well aware of the dangers of being co-opted by the likes of John Boehner and Karl Rove. What we have to focus on is how people like Sarah Palin have so far FAILED -- utterly, completely failed -- to say a single word about who should be investigated or indicted for what has gone on in the financial system, or why we should be outraged about Jamie Dimon's $17M pay-day on the taxpayer dime. Those are just a couple of examples, but Americans would get that -- there was fraud, it was a crime, and someone has to pay the price. And by all means, no one should be making millions of dollars while being propped up by taxpayers. (Some of them get it, already.) But if Palin brought it up, the entire movement would demand that someone pay the price, and that failed banksters be held accountable. If she's leading them by the nose on wedge issues, however, or some vague bull shit about "socialism," they probably won't.
That's why you can't give up on the Tea Party. Given the right leadership, the Tea Party will come down on the right side of the issues. Left in the hands of Glenn Beck, they won't. But now could be the moment to turn things in the right direction. Right now, people are talking about Denninger's comments all over the place, from HuffPo to local Tea Party groups. Some people are pissed. Some are saying, Right on! Others were asking, Who the f*** is Karl Denninger? But really for the first time, Denninger has people talking out loud about where the Tea Party is going and what kind of role people like Sarah Palin are going to play. More importantly, Denninger has renewed the conversation about how to avoid getting stabbed in the back -- again -- by the GOP establishment. Karl Rove doesn't want us to have that conversation. But have it we will. We cannot let the Tea Party movement, which grew spontaneously from the Rant Heard 'Round the World, be co-opted by anyone. All of us -- including Karl Denninger -- have to make sure that doesn't happen. We can stop the looting and start prosecuting, but not by giving up on the Tea Party. Not yet.
##
---
---