Tuesday
Mar242009
Bailout Halleleuiah: We Praise Maxine Waters For Finally Asking The Goldman Question (Video)
My favorite moment from today's Congressional testimony of Geithner and B-52. California Rep. Maxine Waters forces Timmaaay to listen while she recounts the litany of inappropriate Goldman Sachs influence at Treasury and on financial crisis policy .
Finally, somebody had the sack to ask Tim about it publicly. She would have been better served to concentrate on Goldman's role in the AIG decision (why was Lloyd Blankfein at the AIG rescue meeting last Fall?).
There is still one more question that TG and Bernanke need to answer publicly.
Reader Comments (18)
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/bernanke-bombshell-aig-insurer-exposed-to-fp/
The news of today is the Geithner plan. I think this plan might work very well in terms of repairing bank balance sheets.
Of course the whole notion of repairing bank balance sheet is a lie and misdirection. The balance sheets we should want to see repaired are household balance sheets. Banks have failed us profoundly. We want them reorganized, not repaired. A world in which the banks are all fixed but households are still broken is worse than what we have right now. Too-big-to-fail banks restored to health are too-big-to-fail banks restored to power. The idea that fixing legacy banks is prerequisite to fixing the broad economy is a lie perpetrated by legacy bankers.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/03/dark-musings-2009-03-24/
http://animalspiritspage.blogspot.com/2009/03/cash-for-trash.html
Revolution in the Air
It's getting impossible to keep up with the rhetoric and political noise surrounding AIG, the banks, and executive bonuses. Will the government try to rein in executive pay generally, rather than just at AIG? Is this an example of the kind of misguided policy and mass hysteria which results when you try to put politicians in charge of for-profit businesses? Will it wreck the economy outright? Or is the real problem that "the administration's officials are too marinated in the insiders' culture to police it, reform it or own up to their own past complicity with it"?
I don't have any answers, but I do have a question: might we might be seeing the first real rumblings of class warfare -- the genuine article, not the Republican talking-point -- in this country?
http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2009/03/22/revolution-in-the-air?tid=true
I pray that I am wrong. But the administration is rapidly heading in a very dangerous direction, and there's not a lot of time to change course. As of now at least, as Atrios says, it certainly looks as if all this is going to end very badly indeed
http://thegspot.typepad.com/blog/2009/03/yet-another-reason-why-the-bailout-was-a-terrible-idea.html
Nice...er...plug for the Colorectal Cancer Coalition.
Nicely played.
Looking for a job? Try a college town.
Morgantown, W.Va., home to West Virginia University, has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the U.S. -- just 3.9% -- and the university itself has about 260 job openings, from nurses to professors to programmers.
"We're hurting for people, especially to fill our computer and technical positions," says Margaret Phillips, vice president for human relations at WVU.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123783142333116161.html
"The bad assets are bad because they are worth less than the banks say they are. House prices have dropped by nearly 30% nationwide. That has created something in the neighborhood of $5+ trillion of losses in residential real estate alone (off a peak market value of housing about $20+ trillion). The banks don't want to take their share of those losses because doing so will wipe them out. So they, and Geithner, are doing everything they can to pawn the losses off on the taxpayer."
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22289.htm
How about leaving that crap elsewhere. You know what I'm talking about. Thanks in advance.
Anybody know where we can source some Dung beetles en masse on the cheap? If only Congress had included a provision for engines based on feces as bio-fuel in the Stimulus bill. Well, look on the bright side, at least we will have a lifetime supply of fertilizer - enough to swim in for years.
Of course, she lobbied hard TARP funds for a small bank that she has strong ties with.
I guess when they're all assholes you can't expect much more.
You are correct on both counts...Waters did inappropriately lobby for help for a bank in which she or her husband had a financial interest...
Yet, at least she asked the question...it's the first time in my life I have found myself supporting her...but bailout politics make for strange bedfellows...
What's the FUCKING USE of asking "tough questions" when you LACK the authority to FORCE AN ANSWER?
NONE!
It's all just more bread & fucking circus.