Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« Ted Kaufman's Mission To Break Up The Mega Banks | Main | Chanos Calls For DOJ Investigation Into AIG, Lehman (CLIP) »
Saturday
May012010

Bailout Repayment Lies: Still Government Motors (GM)

Share    

From Forbes

By Shikha Dalmia

GM is paying back Uncle Sam to shake him down for more money.

GM CEO Ed Whitacre announced in a Wall Street Journal column Wednesday that his company has paid back its government bailout loan "in full, with interest, years ahead of schedule." He is even running TV ads on all major networks to that effect--a needless expense given that a credulous media is only too happy to parrot his claims for free. Detroit Free Press' Mike Thompson, for example, advises bailout proponents to start "warming up their vocal chords" to jeer their opponents with chants of "I told you so."

But before belting out their victory aria, GM-boosters ought to hear the whole story--not just the fairytale version about Government Motors' grand comeback that Mr. Whitacre is feeding them.

Uncle Sam gave GM $49.5 billion last summer in aid to finance its bankruptcy. (If it hadn't, the company, which couldn't raise this kind of money from private lenders, would have been forced into liquidation, its assets sold for scrap.) So when Mr. Whitacre publishes a column with the headline, "The GM Bailout: Paid Back in Full," most ordinary mortals unfamiliar with bailout minutia would assume that he is alluding to the entire $49.5 billion. That, however, is far from the case.

---

GM Bailout Song: No Alexis Glick in my Obamamobile  >>

---

Because a loan of such a huge amount would have been politically controversial, the Obama administration handed GM only $6.7 billion as a pure loan. (It asked for only a 7% interest rate--a very sweet deal considering that GM bonds at that time were trading below junk level.) The vast bulk of the bailout money was transferred to GM through the purchase of 60.8% equity stake in the company--arguably an even worse deal for taxpayers than the loan, given that the equity position requires them to bear the risk of the investment without any guaranteed return. (The Canadian government likewise gave GM $1.4 billion as a pure loan, and another $8.1 billion for an 11.7% equity stake. The U.S. and Canadian government together own 72.5% of the company.)

But when Mr. Whitacre says GM has paid back the bailout money in full, he means not the entire $49.5 billion--the loan and the equity. In fact, he avoids all mention of that figure in his column. He means only the $6.7 billion loan amount.

But wait! Even that's not the full story given that GM, which has not yet broken even, much less turned a profit, can't pay even this puny amount from its own earnings.

So how is it paying it?

As it turns out, the Obama administration put $13.4 billion of the aid money as "working capital" in an escrow account when the company was in bankruptcy. The company is using this escrow money--government money--to pay back the government loan.

GM claims that the fact that it is even using the escrow money to pay back the loan instead of using it all to shore itself up shows that it is on the road to recovery. That actually would be a positive development--although hardly one worth hyping in ads and columns--if it were not for a further plot twist.

---

Read part 2 at Forbes  >>

 

 

 

 


PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

No Alexis Glick In My Obamamobile (Song By Mike Robinson)

http://dailybail.com/home/no-alexis-glick-in-my-obamamobile-song-by-mike-robinson.html
May 1, 2010 at 7:39 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Listen to this one DB, Krauthammer, as usual, he hits it out of the park.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uArJNbuNkRk

Why don't you post this one? Really, why?
May 2, 2010 at 4:13 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra
That's rich coming from a neo-con snake like Krauthammer, but he's exactly right on this one. (The DB-baiting is tiresome, however. Jim Bunning has been posted many times here and he's much more conservative and right-wing than Krauthammer and his Zionist pals like "Savage".)
May 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM | Unregistered CommenterJames H
Neo-con, how so?
May 2, 2010 at 4:52 PM | Unregistered CommenterZarathustra

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.