Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« NYT: JPMorgan Prop Trading Loss May Reach $9 Billion | Main | Fed's Evans Begs For More QE, Tax Cheats Got $1.4 Billion In Stimulus Loans, Germans Choose Euro Over Deutschmark In New Poll, Houston Strip Clubs Hit By New 'Pole Tax' »
Thursday
Jun282012

HR 459 - Ron Paul's 'Audit The Fed' Bill Is Back!

Complete video from today's hearing.

Paul to Bernanke: "This isn't a clown bill, bro..."

Quick rundown.  257 co-sponsors is fewer than last time, but it will pass the House easily, same as last time.  The real battle will be in the Senate, where Bernie Sanders caved in 2010 and weakened the first audit's scope, though it was still a massive victory as it forced the Fed to come clean on $16 trillion of secret loans to Wall Street, and diffused Bernanke's specious argument that disclosure of emergency program details would harm the banks who got the help.  The only one who tried to weaken the bill was the wondrously gifted gentleman from North Carolina, Rep. Elijah Cummings, who simultaneously sucks on Bernanke's left and right teat.

---

The Hill

The House Oversight Committee easily cleared legislation Wednesday that would require a top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve.  The bill, sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), was advanced by the committee on a bipartisan voice vote with no vocal opposition. The measure, which has garnered 257 co-sponsors from both parties, would require the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a full audit of the Fed's operations, including its monetary policy deliberations, for the first time.

Before the audit bill cleared the oversight committee on Wednesday, ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) attempted to introduce an amendment that would prevent the GAO from auditing the Fed's deliberations on monetary policy. Cummings withdrew the amendment after Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) voiced opposition, saying it "essentially guts this bill."

---

Official Statement From Rep. Darrell Issa:

(WASHINGTON)–On a bipartisan voice vote the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee advanced H.R. 459, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, introduced by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. The bill is supported by a bipartisan coalition of more than 220 Democratic and Republican members of the House.

Chairman Issa said, “President Reagan’s first OMB director recently pointed out it took 93 years for the federal reserve to build a balance sheet of $900 billion dollars, but only seven weeks to add the next $900 billion after Lehman crashed in 2008.  The Fed’s balance sheet now stands at nearly $3 trillion. It is long past time for a real audit.”

“The public has a right to know how government spends taxpayer dollars and they have a right to know how government agencies—especially the Federal Reserve—leverage that revenue to create trillions in new debt.  This measure will bring vital transparency to long-secret Federal Reserve activities affecting public interests,” Chairman Issa added.

The bill is anticipated to be voted on by the full House of Representatives later this summer. During the Committee mark-up on the legislation, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) spoke prominently in support of the measure citing a desire for greater transparency in government operations.

---

Official statement from Rep. Ron Paul:

“I am very happy that the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform today passed H.R. 459. The bill passed unanimously by voice vote, with all of its strong audit provisions intact. It is time for the Federal Reserve to face a thorough audit of its monetary policy and lending operations. The Fed’s purchases of dubious assets from favored Wall Street institutions; its lending of hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign governments and central banks; and the prospect of further quantitative easing and European bailouts underscore the critical need for transparency. I am deeply appreciative of the overwhelming support this legislation has received from my colleagues in the House, especially today from the Oversight Committee. I look forward to seeing my Audit the Fed legislation passed by a bipartisan majority of Congress next month."

Official statement from Sen. Rand Paul:

“Today, I applaud the unanimous passage of Audit the Fed out of committee and commend House leadership for promising a vote on Audit the Fed next month,” Sen. Paul said. “It is important that we get our economy growing again through savings and investment, not more debt and deficit spending. But we can’t turn the economy around until we fix the root of the problem: an unaccountable Federal Reserve. A complete and thorough audit of the Fed will finally allow the American people to know exactly how their money is being spent by Washington.  I have introduced similar legislation in the Senate and will continue to fight on the frontlines of this battle to get Audit the Fed passed through Congress.”

---

So, Bernanke, who got the money?

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (30)

Tempers Flare In Clash Over Fed Secrecy As Grayson Reminds Watt: "The Road To Hell Is Paved With Good Intentions"

http://dailybail.com/home/tempers-flare-in-clash-over-fed-secrecy-as-grayson-reminds-w.html

Good clip of Grayson exposing Fed secrets - runs 1 minute.
Jun 27, 2012 at 6:42 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
DB, did you see this piece.........

Romney does not yet have the nomination locked up.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/19/rnc-calls-frivolous-lawsuit-by-ron-paul-supporters/
Jun 27, 2012 at 8:42 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
No, I hadn't seen that story Dar, thanks. The convention will be more interesting this year than it's been in a great while. The Ron Paul people have been phenomenal in securing delegate spots.
Jun 27, 2012 at 9:02 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I have to wonder how many of the Representatives cosponsoring and voicing this bill through the house are trolling to see how much they can get for a nay if it ever comes to the floor for a vote. Remember HR1207, I think 114 of the original cosponsors voted against a motion to return the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill to committee and add back the original full Fed audit and Dodd Frank ended up a gutless wonder.
Jun 27, 2012 at 9:21 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
The last audit-the-fed effort "was still a massive victory as it forced the Fed to come clean on $16 trillion of secret loans to Wall Street."

Completely agree, DB. I'd add a couple of things that got lost in the outrage when the secret Fed loan information was finally disgorged late last year.

First, after the Fed's welfare program was disclosed for all to see, the whole wide world didn't come to an end, which is exactly the argument (threat) that the Fed's lawyers made in fighting the Freedom of Information Act case brought against the Fed by Bloomberg. It proved, yet again, that the banksters are lying when they put forth the doomsday scenarios about what "would" happen if people don't cave in to their demands. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals correctly rejected the Fed's nonsense argument.

Second, the disclosure of the Fed's lending to Wall Street underscores how insolvent Wall Street banks really are. In the Fall of '08, everyone thought TARP--$700 billion--was where the action was. Turns out TARP was peanuts. Wall Street needed TRILLIONS to stay afloat. And I guarantee you it's even worse today. A lot worse.
Jun 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
I have to wonder how many of the Representatives cosponsoring and voicing this bill through the house are trolling to see how much they can get for a nay if it ever comes to the floor for a vote. Remember HR1207, I think 114 of the original cosponsors voted against a motion to return the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill to committee and add back the original full Fed audit and Dodd Frank ended up a gutless wonder.

---

It was better than nothing, sage, though it was very disappointing at the time. As cheyenne mentions, the first audit has helped pave the way for a 2nd and more complete audit. I am more optimistic this time that something with teeth passes the senate.
Jun 28, 2012 at 1:16 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Second, the disclosure of the Fed's lending to Wall Street underscores how insolvent Wall Street banks really are. In the Fall of '08, everyone thought TARP--$700 billion--was where the action was. Turns out TARP was peanuts. Wall Street needed TRILLIONS to stay afloat. And I guarantee you it's even worse today. A lot worse.

---

Good point.
Jun 28, 2012 at 1:44 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Along those lines, check out this quote from Dimon's testimony before the Senate:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jp-morgans-chief-seeks-old-testament-justice-2012-06-15

“Many analysts have reached the conclusion that if you would have applied that Old Testament justice in 2008 and 2009, J.P. Morgan would have gone down, and you would have been out of a job,” Oregon Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley reminded Dimon. “How many companies in the history of the planet have been offered a half a trillion dollars in low-interest loans?”

“You were misinformed,” Dimon retorted. J.P. Morgan took unprecedented billions from the government and the Federal Reserve only because it was asked to help save the system, Dimon explained. “They said, “Please, use these facilities,’” Dimon said. “We would have been OK.”

---

So according to Dimon, not only was jpmorgan forced to take TARP funds, but it was the Fed who pressured them into taking $500 billion in zero-interest loans.

That is complete bullshit.
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:05 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Dimon straight up lied to Merkley, not once, but twice. You know it's funny. When the Senate first called Dimon to testify, it was supposed to have been under oath. But somehow no one in the Senate saw fit to swear Dimon in as a witness, so at least he didn't perjure himself. So we got that going for us....

http://www.usabailout.com/content/why-did-jamie-dimon-lie-congress-about-jp-morgan’s-bailouts
Jun 28, 2012 at 8:31 AM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
"Don't ask, don't tell. Throw Jamie Dimon down the well!"

LOL! I had a few of the occupy streamers chanting that when they were protesting this turd after his "testimony".

I was almost succesful in inciting a riot from FL on a ustream channel.
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:28 AM | Unregistered Commenterchunga
I would be securing your assets, this is not going to stop till every invested dollar in this nation is sucked up, retirements, investments, property, nothing is sacred anymore. This audit in the end will be whitewashed also.

And the victims will take the blame as usual...
Jun 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM | Unregistered CommenterS. Gompers
I was almost succesful in inciting a riot from FL on a ustream channel.

---

That's a great story, chunga.
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I would be securing your assets, this is not going to stop till every invested dollar in this nation is sucked up, retirements, investments, property, nothing is sacred anymore. This audit in the end will be whitewashed also.

And the victims will take the blame as usual...

---

I understand your sentiment, gomp. But I've only been back for about 2 days, so float some optimism, even if it's fake. I can't run this site if I actually consider the true implications of everything I report.
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:34 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Cheyenne

http://www.usabailout.com/content/why-did-jamie-dimon-lie-congress-about-jp-morgan%E2%80%99s-bailouts

I read that article a few nights ago when I was trolling your site. It's a stellar bit of work. Who the hell wrote it?
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:37 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
DB, we WILL win. SCOTUS just set the blogosphere on fire. Note the comments on Naked C -- the progs are as incensed as we are. And for the same reasons. Moreover, they immediately connect the O Care ruling with all the other corruption. Your job is to make sure Jamie D goes to jail. And I've got some ideas for how to make that happen. Having the Bail back on line has lifted my spirits like nothing else has in the past 4 months. Go get'em!
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterPitchfork
"That's NOT some clown encouragement, bro..."

Thanks, Pitch. Have you seen Simon Johnson's petition to get Dimon kicked off the NYFed...I'll be posting it soon.

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/jamie-dimon-must-resign-or-be-removed-from-the-new-york-federal-reserve-board-of-directors

We need to brainstorm soon.
Jun 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
Counterfeiters have been in control for too long......that would include CONgress----a supreme counterfeiting mafia.
Jun 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM | Unregistered Commenterponomo
"But somehow no one in the Senate saw fit to swear Dimon in as a witness,"

You can thank Spencer Bachus for that. He's got to do something to justify the cash JPMorgan Chase has given him. Somewhere around $120,000 plus or minus a couple thousand. Sounded like his mouth was full of marbles when he was explaining to the committee why Dimon didn't need to be sworn in. I really don't think Dimon gave a damn, Sworn in or not he's going to lie anyway.
Jun 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
Sage--

The Federal Rules allow any committee member to swear in a witness, not just the chair. It's absolutely ridiculous that not one Senator or his staff knows the most rudimentary of procedural rules. Or they do know and are so corrupt they don't care. Either way, the terms of 2 U.S.C. 191 are so simple an ape could understand them. The theater in the House over swearing the witness demonstrated the ignorance of every single member of the entire committee, and their questions were even more pathetic.

Despite the mental retardation in Congress that was on display, Dimon STILL couldn't get through the incompetent softball questions without lying.

I'd have CREAMED Dimon inside of 2 minutes examining such an ass clown.
Jun 28, 2012 at 7:28 PM | Unregistered CommenterCheyenne
Cheyenne, I would love to see you rake some of these crooked ba**stards over the coals. Especially Jamie Dimon, That hearing was pathetic, more evidence of the corruption infesting
Wall Street and Washington D.C.
Jun 28, 2012 at 8:27 PM | Unregistered CommenterSagebrush
"Holly Crap", I feel all warm-n-fuzzy, inside. DB 's back. Now if we could just find that other guy thats missing..........."Santa Clauz"............

Now the real work ( Fight ) beguins............!
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:09 PM | Unregistered CommenterTexas Dar
Tex, how many people fit on that plane of yours? I want a ride.

I've got some shit going on that will probably get me captured and sent to FEMA.

Wrote this Open Letter and sent it to the Presiding Justice, Senate President and Majority Leader.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/96454240/An-Open-Letter-to-the-State-of-Rhode-Island-Superior-Court-June-9-2012-Regarding-Foreclosure-Fraud

Then this electronic petition. Less than 200 signatures.

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-honorable-presiding-justice-alice-p-gibney-recuse-justice-s-allen-p-rubine-and-michael-a-silverstein

Looks like the "s" in the url is messing up the link.

I am getting burnt out and I think the apathy is what bothers me most. And I mean burnt out. Day and night for years really takes a toll.
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:25 PM | Unregistered Commenterchunga
Somebody has to kick me in the ass and wake me up. I am on a mission and need to keep up my energy to get this done.
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:30 PM | Unregistered Commenterchunga
What's the case in a nutshell, chunga...that these judges don't follow RI state law in foreclosure cases?
Jun 28, 2012 at 9:57 PM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I know this does not amount to much. but Elijah Cummings is a representative from Baltimore. Don't know why he would water this down. Has anyone seen his questioning of Neil Kaskari. Maybe it was a show. He does hammer the pavement in Baltimore pretty hard though for his costituents.
Jun 28, 2012 at 10:43 PM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
@DB here is what the judge says. I have a certified transcript.

“I mean, was there a mortgage debt that was owned by Fleet, but don’t give me this note, separate the note from the mortgage stuff.”

“Just, was there a mortgage debt, because of the mortgage debt – if the mortgage was properly transferred, then going with it is the debt that’s secured thereby.”

“I’ve said that in 14 different cases and I’ll stick by it.”

“There’s a statute in Rhode Island that makes that absolutely clear, that it’s not a question of a physical piece of paper called a “note,” it’s a question of indebtedness and that the indebtedness follows the mortgage.”

This is in direct violation of R.I.G.L. 34-11-24. The legislative intent of the entire enactment is being ignored and he admits he will "prejudge" every case and cite his own rulings *only* to support this.
Jun 29, 2012 at 12:02 AM | Unregistered Commenterchunga
I know this does not amount to much. but Elijah Cummings is a representative from Baltimore. Don't know why he would water this down. Has anyone seen his questioning of Neil Kaskari. Maybe it was a show.

---

Thanks for the correction on Baltimore vs. North Carolina. I was thinking of Melvin Watt from NC who tried to stop the bill last time, which is why I jumped on him in the story. And I do remember the kashkari grilling:

"Are you a chump, Kashkari?"

http://dailybail.com/home/is-kashkari-a-chump-classic-video.html
Jun 29, 2012 at 12:49 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
I am borderline spamming here. I have just learned that n about 3 hours, all of the Rubine Decisions will be on line. The first test on Eaton will take place in RI.

Why is RI so different? Because of the moratorium on foreclosures in Federal Court. ALL foreclosures are STAYED. There will be mandatory mediation. The bankers will be required to bring in their "papers" too. They will be sworn in and be under oath. If Rubine smashes away the standing issue the bank pigs will cite all that crap from him.

Below is the ORDER.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/77357439/Special-Master-1-5-2012

And here is the TEETH of the ORDER.

"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims completely and/or order the appearance of any non-parties, including but not limited to municipal and other governmental officials and lien holders, that may be essential for a total resolution of the claims."

That means you FNMA and FHLMC. There will no protective orders allowed. You must appear. That is it.

I'm spamming this shit again and you have to copy and paste the URL because the "s" screws up the autolink. If you have fadebook or twitter or whatever fling it around. Make these pricks follow the law. Period.

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-honorable-presiding-justice-alice-p-gibney-recuse-justice-s-allen-p-rubine-and-michael-a-silverstein
Jun 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM | Unregistered Commenterchunga
Anyone read Shock Doctrine. What we are witnessing here has been balanced and blueprinted through smaller countries and has been tried on larger economies. As Dylan has claimed, we are being extracted, and we are paying our representatives to do so. It really is amazing just how cheap our elected officials are. Some will sell out for a six pack of cheap beer. Anyway, thanks D.B for all you do.
Jun 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM | Unregistered CommenterSKINFLINT
It's July 4th, 2012 - Do YOU KNOW what time it is?
(It's time to pass H.R. 459, and AUDIT THE 'FED'!)
http://chooseliberty.org/auditrphf3.aspx?pid=0703

http://www.chooseliberty.org/mailin/audit_donate1_mail.htm?i=CL090077-0703
Jul 4, 2012 at 9:55 AM | Unregistered CommenterAnonPatriot

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.