Quantcast
Feeds: Email, RSS & Twitter

Get Our Videos By Email

 

8,300 Unique Visitors In The Past Day

 

Powered by Squarespace

 

Most Recent Comments
Cartoons & Photos
SEARCH
« JPMorgan Wins Dismissal Of Silver Price Fixing Lawsuit | Main | Whistleblower In JPM Silver Scandal Injured In Mysterious Hit & Run »
Tuesday
Mar192013

NSL RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL: "The Most Significant Court Victory For Constitutional Rights Since Bush Signed The Patriot Act"

Eric Holder body slam.  Celebrate people.  This is a victory.

A monumental court ruling reaffirming the constitution and rebuking the Justice Department came down late Friday in California.  All hail Judge Susan Illston and the brass set she wears under the robe.

---

 

[Note: Scroll Down for Judge's Document and Video.]

 

Judge Declares FBI's Warrantless Surveillance Unconstitutional

Slate

They are used by the FBI to bypass courts and conduct secret surveillance.  But now, in what could prove to be a major blow to the Department of Justice, a federal court has found that National Security Letters are unconstitutional.

In a ruling released today, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said that NSLs suffer from “significant constitutional defects” and violate the First Amendment because of the way they can be used to effectively gag companies that receive them.  Illston has ordered the FBI to stop issuing NSLs and cease enforcing their gag provisions in all cases.  However, the ruling has been stayed for 90 days, giving the government the chance to appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals because of the “constitutional and national security issues at stake.”

NSLs were created in the late 1970s to help the FBI obtain information about suspected foreign spies. But their use was expanded under the Patriot Act following 9/11, and they can now be used to order companies to provide data on Americans.  Last week, Google disclosed that it had been forced to hand over data on thousands of its users in recent years after being served with NSLs—but it was able to divulge only vague information, rather than exact numbers.  A company that receives a NSL can be forbidden from talking about it with anyone but a lawyer, or else potentially face years in prison.

Between 2003 and 2006 nearly 200,000 NSLs were used by the FBI to obtain information about people.  In 2007, a report by the Justice Department’s inspector general raised concerns about the use of the letters to “obtain vast quantities of telephone numbers or other records with a single request.”  The DOJ said in a statement today that it was reviewing the California ruling.  It is likely that it will file an appeal. In the meantime, civil liberties and privacy groups will continue to celebrate what they are claiming as a landmark victory that will "help restore balance between liberty and security."

Continue reading...

 

---

Judge's Ruling Blows Hole In FBI's Illegal Privacy Program

Guardian

The Californian telecom company thought to be behind a stunning court victory that has blown a hole in the FBI's highly secretive system for collecting US citizens' private data has hailed the "significant" legal breakthrough. Credo, based in San Francisco, spoke out after a federal judge ordered the US government to stop issuing what are called "national security letters" – demands for data that contain in-built gagging clauses that prevent the recipients disclosing even the existence of the orders or their own identity.

Michael Kieschnick, chief executive of Credo Mobile, hailed the judge's order as "the most significant court victory for our constitutional rights since the dark day when George W Bush signed the Patriot Act."

Kieschnick said:

"This decision is notable for its clarity and depth.  From this day forward, the US government's unconstitutional practice of using national security letters to obtain private information without court oversight and its denial of the first amendment rights of national security letter recipients have finally been stopped by our courts."

Last year the FBI sent out more than 16,000 of the letters relating to the private data – mainly financial, internet or phone records – of more than 7,000 Americans.

Previous court action has led to the FBI being accused of abusing its powers under the NSL statute by issuing the letters far more extensively than in the limited counter-terrorism situations for which they were devised.  The letters are among the most secretive tools of any deployed by the US state.  As an additional affront, civil liberties groups say, the FBI is allowed to issue the letters without approval from a judge.  Only the green light of a local FBI chief is required.

 

Judge's NSL Order - Scribd

 

Duvall smells something in the air:

Napalm in the morning.  Smells like victory.

 

 

FBI laughs at the law:

FBI Says 'Fuck You' To Transparency Request

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

"..the ruling has been stayed for 90 days, giving the government the chance to appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals because of the “constitutional and national security issues at stake.”

Flash forward 90 days and check-out how U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's ruling is NOT ONLY OVERTURNED, but she herself is probably transfered to a federal courthouse somewhere in ALASKA.
Mar 18, 2013 at 4:02 AM | Unregistered CommenterRecoveryless Recovery
Will be watching to see what DOJ does, if they file an immediate appeal, or let this one slide. It would be a really smart move on Obama's part to let this one go without a fight. His legacy on the Left is being destroyed over drones, kill lists, privacy incursions and annihilations, pot busts. It would earn him points with progressives and create some good press if he decided not to fight, and dropped NSLs completely.
Mar 18, 2013 at 4:12 AM | Registered CommenterDailyBail
If the ruling holds, wonder what we'll hear from those that received NSLs? This could be fun.
Mar 18, 2013 at 5:29 AM | Unregistered CommenterTR
Hello all,

While Judge Illston's ruling constitutes cause for celebration, the resultant reverie will likely be short-lived, as the resource rich National Security State counts among the coterie of mercenary intellectuals in its employ, contingency planners that are among the best at what they do.

If I may hazard a guess -- and it is only a guess -- it would be that the FBI had surely formulated a "Plan B" to be implemented were the District Court not to rule in their favor.

Look for the Bureau to locate a pliable Jurist, i.e., an official who is either ideologically in sync with the government or, who is firmly under governmental control -- in other words, susceptible to blackmail.

For once a government goes rogue, its longstanding culpability denies it the option of remedial measures, at which point the "law" is "reinterpreted" in such a way as to conform to Aaron Burr's definition thereof, that being " ... any principle that is boldly asserted."

The corruptions that infest America are dark and deep, so much so as to be altogether immune to reason, and all those who seek redress from its arbitrary usurpations will not attain such correctives by peaceful means.

That, gentle readers, is the state of the State in A.D. 2013.

Cheers,

JQP
Mar 18, 2013 at 2:20 PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn Q. Parvenu
"It would be a really smart move on Obama's part to let this one go without a fight. His legacy on the Left is being destroyed .."

The Daily Bail mistakenly continues to believe that American political life is divided into Right & Left when in REALITY it is now divided between CORPORATE interests and all the REST OF US.

Hussein Obankster's ONLY legacy shall consist of having embodied the P-E-R-F-E-C-T WALL ST MEAT PUPPET.
Mar 18, 2013 at 6:38 PM | Unregistered CommenterRecoveryless Recovery

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.