Obama Says He Would NEVER Lie About Benghazi
BUSTED
THAT'S NOT WHAT WE DO
Obama Outraged At Suggestion He Would Play Politics Or Mislead About Benghazi
During the second Presidential Debate, President Obama was indignant at the suggestion that anyone on his team would play politics or mislead the public about Benghazi. Recent reports suggest that talking points were altered to remove references to al Qaeda and prior attacks in Benghazi.
And that's just the first lie. The second lie is his claim about "hunting down those who committed this crime," at least not according to this story and the following video.
Do NOT Skip This
Special Report: New Benghazi Developments
Watch the first 2 minutes. We know who masterminded and led the attack and where that person is, but Obama is afraid to deliver the punishment.
Details
Report: We Have the Intel to Kill, Capture Those Responsible for Benghazi Attack
The United States has identified the mastermind of the attack on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi that left four Americans dead but is not moving to kill or capture him, according to a source in special operations who helped to debrief survivors.
"We basically don’t want to upset anybody. We have the intelligence and capability, all the training, all the capacity to kill and capture the terrorists involved with the specific events in Libya and Ambassador Stevens’s death. And we know where they are."
---
Full Debate Clip
Watch the first 2 minutes. Trust me.
Must Read
The Benghazi Talking Points - How They Were Changed To Hide The Truth
Members of U.S. diplomatic mission who died in Benghazi
May 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM
Reader Comments (8)
FBI Releases Wanted Photos for Benghazi Attack
http://freebeacon.com/fbi-releases-wanted-photos-for-benghazi-attack/
Strange that neither Obama nor Hillary Clinton is shown in the wanted photo.
About what would, will he lie then?
Deja vu. We did nothing about Bin Laden before 9/11 - Clinton did not want to upset our Saudi friends.
Beside Shrillary.
In 1996 Rice helped persuade President Clinton to rebuff Sudan’s offer to turn Osama bin Laden, who was then living there, over to U.S. authorities. Rice reasoned that because Sudan had a poor human-rights record, the U.S. should have no dealings with that nation’s government — not even to obtain custody of the al Qaeda leader or to receive intelligence information on terrorists from Sudanese authorities. Bin Laden subsequently moved his terrorist operations to Afghanistan, from where he would mastermind the 9/11 attacks.”
United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice should not be given any more promotions. In fact, maybe she should be removed. How could we possibly say something like this about a lady that our President so vehemently respects and defends? Well, maybe because we know that had Susan Rice not given the wrong advice to President Clinton in 1996, Osama Bin Laden would have been in jail and the twin towers may well still be seen today!
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/11/heres-why-susan-rice-should-be-removed-not-promoted/#ixzz2SedVeqEf