Wednesday
May042011
Ted Poe Destroys The Environmental Illusion: Dear Thomas Edison: Turn Off The Lights, The Party's Over
Video - Rep. Ted Poe - April 6, 2011
Congress's energy bill bans incandescent light bulbs by 2014, and requires Americans to buy compact fluorescent bulbs. Those are called CFLs, are made exclusively in China and they contain mercury.
---
Environmentally friendly light bulbs ‘can give you skin cancer’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-506082/Environmentally-friendly-light-bulbs-skin-cancer.html
Reader Comments (37)
Investors eye Spain after Portugal says it needs a bailout
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/markets-take-portugal-in-stride-eye-spain-2011-04-07
http://refreshingnews9.blogspot.com/2011/04/georgian-woman-cuts-off-web-access-to.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-07/initial-unemployment-claims-in-u-s-decline-more-than-estimated-to-382-000.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-06/obama-summons-lawmakers-to-white-house-in-bid-to-avert-shutdown.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-07/euro-weakens-after-portugal-bailout-overshadows-rate-increase-expectations.html
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=183804
[snip]
As a result, we are asking as part of your probe, that this task force and the National Association of Attorney Generals require that all past and present MERS assignments of deeds of trust/mortgages be filed in local recording offices throughout the United States immediately.
Comment (grin): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A52p9jc-gOo
it's a biohazard when it breaks...stop foisting your nonsense on the rest of us...you buy them if you want, but don't make a mandate out of your personal insanity...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDXQsnkuBCM&feature=player_embedded&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fv%2FPDXQsnkuBCM%26hl%3Den_US%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded%26version%3D3&has_verified=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDdkzjfUnJQ&feature=player_embedded
They are also much more efficient in converting the input energy into light compared to incandescent bulbs. An incandescent bulb, on average, will only convert about 2% of the input energy into light, the rest is converted into heat. This causes the bulb's filament to sometimes reach temperatures as high 2300*C, thus making them a much greater fire hazard. Fluorescent bulbs, in contrast, convert on average 22% of the input energy into light.
As has been noted, these bulbs contain trace amounts of mercury. What should be noted is the very miniscule amounts that are contained within these bulbs, 3-5mg per bulb - the tip of a ball point pen is a comparable amount. Newer bulbs contain as little as 1mg of mercury. Such trace amounts make the shards of a broken bulb a greater health risk than the lingering mercury. Should extra care be taken when using these bulbs? Absolutely. Personal responsibility is never a bad thing.
Also, these bulbs ARE recyclable; they only enter landfills when homeowners aren’t responsible enough to properly dispose of them.
What irks me is the hypocrisy in the esteemed congressman's speech when he speaks of his concerns for the toxicity of fluorescent bulbs, and then equates that to the need for 'the good old days' of Coal, Oil, and Natural gas - industries that spill hundreds of toxic chemicals into the environment every year.
Complete and utter nonsense.
And I have to feel warm and fuzzy for Edison's incandescent light bulbs?
With the heat the the pig light puts out I would neaver use one inside the cabin. Way to many homes have burned to the ground becouse of these bulbs...............!
Its just more "Bull Shit" from our piece of shit goverment trying to control us, and force us to pay 78% more than normal, for the same time.
Evan if they last 48% longer than normal bulbs, I'll burn the "Safe Ones".............................!
What irks me is the hypocrisy in the esteemed congressman's speech when he speaks of his concerns for the toxicity of fluorescent bulbs, and then equates that to the need for 'the good old days' of Coal, Oil, and Natural gas - industries that spill hundreds of toxic chemicals into the environment every year.
Read all the comments & then realized that Poe is just another POLITICIAN !!!
How dumb am I ?
http://www.dhses.ny.gov/ofpc/news/press/documents/2011_Safety_Alert_CFL_Actual.pdf
A safety spec sheet...
http://www.tcpi.com/PDF/2007_40495%20TCP%20MSDS%20CFL%20rev%20SS.pdf
and a MSDS you all should look at in case you have one break.
http://assets.sylvania.com/assets/documents/fl_psds5.0f746047-64f7-46cf-80d5-89a9282aa07f.pdf
With a good ol' Texas drawl a quote from blue collar comedy, "You just can't fix stupid"...
11:1 efficiency advantage for fluorescent:incandescent? I thought it was more like 5:1, as in you'll burn 20 watts for a CFL that equals a 100-watt incandescent as measured in lumens.
CFL's represent a special place in the history of American manufacturing and intellectual property. In the late 1970's, every major lighting manufacturer in the U.S. (GE, Westinghouse, Sylvania, etc.) knew it was possible to fit an electronic inverter into the 1" base of a screw-in bulb, but they couldn't get it right in the lab. The negative marginal resistance of an arc and its effects gave circuit designers fits. Companies really didn't start getting it right until the late 1980's, by which time off-shoring had begun in one form or another.
But the bigger problem then was the de-emphasis of manufacturing and the greater reliance on marketing and finance. Jack Welch of GE was to me a satanic figure at that point, when I'd planned on a manufacturing career in electronics. The mood of engineers on plant floors everywhere was bitingly sardonic, and is captured perfectly in the spoof video put together by some really funny dudes at Chrysler back then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXW0bx_Ooq4
At any rate, the action in lighting is now in LED's. The dominant constraint now is the upper limit on wattage, now at about 50W due to heat (as I recall). That's about to radically increase, I believe, at least in a single prototype. A working model is likely to work first in the U.S., as we are hands-down the most inventive culture that ever existed.
Whether we can parlay that into millions of bulbs per unit time is a very different question, and has been since we started thinking manufacturing was dirty and getting rid of it wasn't that big of a deal since we'd all get richer.
The money masters call that progress as they work to destroy our nation.
A year ago I would've said we're going back to the year 1214.
But after living in Vietnam Indiana for stretches here and there, I think we've still got an out or two. Salt-of-the-earth Americans are real tough to beat.
But Divine Right of Kings era strikes me as WAY too far back. Laws and not men dates back to 1215, no?
I never was a big fan of the Divine Right of Kings, though many would like to see a return to that.
http://www.noneckschevelle.com/images/carpics/bucks72chevelle.jpg
Those were the days...
It's this "doing God's work" and that feudalistic spinal shiv feel I get that has me outta sorts. Those sociopaths don't care if we're in fucking caves if it means 25 more cents. These people require a remedy.
I would hate to see that happen, when the solution to all that woes us is sorta simple.
End the private Central Bank, and return to sound money. All it takes is the stroke of a pen...
Yup. And the heads that it'd roll on that stroke are all the right ones.
But out of all of them, I would like my 64 Impala SS rag top back. But the one worth the most today is one I gave a way becouse I wanted a Hurst 4 speed on the floor again........What a dumb shit head I was. It was "Mint"........67,000 and I wanted a 4 speed...........................
I would give my right nut, to have this one back. It was a 1 year run................and I gave it away.....? Check this Clasic 1969 Merc out.................... http://www.lov2xlr8.no/brochures/mercury/69mercu/bilder/9.jpg
Guess what its worth today....? You neaver see one at the car shows. I would of traded my tour bus if I could find that car. But, guys just dont get it, do they.....?
Environmentally friendly light bulbs ‘can give you skin cancer’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-506082/Environmentally-friendly-light-bulbs-skin-cancer.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110504/ap_on_re_us/us_climate_trust_lawsuits
[snip]
BILLINGS, Mont. – A group of attorneys representing children and young adults began to file legal actions Wednesday in every state and the District of Columbia in an effort to force government intervention on climate change.
Note: What are climate activists doing in Pakistan?
http://action.350.org/content_item/disasters
Whos else takes an interest in climate change?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121352495
Oooooohhhhh...... Just In
Bill Richardson: Osama bin Laden's death changes climate on energy
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54260.html
[snip]
“We can sit back and say, ‘Well we’ll wait until the next election, wait until the political climate is better.’ You know if we do that, we’re doomed — if we don’t take action right away,” he said.
The former energy secretary and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations in the Clinton administration called for a comprehensive nationwide greenhouse gas reduction program in addition to a national renewable energy standard.